I am part of the ecofeminism presentation team, but reading the articles
a few weeks ago was not my first experience with ecofeminism. Freshman year I
was in a philosophy class that looked at humans and technology. We had to do a group project at the end
of the semester and I do not remember exactly what my project was all about but
I do remember researching Vandana Shiva. She was my first look at ecofeminism.
So my general understanding of ecofeminism was that men think they are better
than women so they dominate them, and women are associated with nature so men
dominate nature too. And that all comes together in a real world example when
men running big businesses in the United States tell men and women in Indian
(and elsewhere) how to interact with nature through agricultural practices. The
land and the people are being degraded and dominated by western masculine
ideals. I reacted strongly to the domination of anyone who cannot stand up for
themselves, just because you have the power doesn’t mean you have to wield it
in a harmful manner.
And there are forms of dominance all over the world, men over women,
adults over children, developed countries over developing countries, people
over nature, etc.
Erica, you raise a good point about those that have power not having to exert their power in harmful ways. I am curious though why this is so often the case? While I know that this can certainly be changed, I wonder if humans have a natural tendency to do this, or if this phenomenon was socially constructed throughout time.
ReplyDelete